NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council [2009] NSWLEC 90
APPLICANT: Ivan Jeray
FIRST RESPONDENT: Blue Mountains City Council PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT: Greg Egan
THIRD RESPONDENT: John Egan
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40986 of 2008
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- whether hearing date should be vacated where applicant is litigant in person - whether directions or changes to directions for trial and as to subpoenas and conduct money should be made.
DATES OF HEARING: 26 June 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 26 June 2009
APPLICANT: Mr I Jeray, in person SOLICITORS N/A
FIRST RESPONDENT: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr I Hemmings, barrister SOLICITORS Marsdens Law Group
SECOND & THIRD RESPONDENT: Mr P Clay, barrister SOLICITORS McIntosh McPhillamy & Co
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
BISCOE J
26 June 2009
40986 of 2008
IVAN JERAY v BLUE MOUNTAINS CITY COUNCIL & ORS
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: This is a notice of motion by the applicant filed on 22 June 2009 seeking various directions, including, as emerged during the hearing, that the hearing date, which has been fixed for 13 July, be vacated and that a new hearing date be fixed on 3 August.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate