NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Procopiadis v Marrickville Council [2009] NSWLEC 1241
APPLICANT Procopiadis, Nicholas PARTIES : RESPONDENT Marrickville Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10190 of 2009
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- brothel; suitability of location; proximity to recreation area; amenity; impact on neighbours; traffic/parking.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2001
Alphatex Australia v The Hills Shire Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 1126 Zhang v Ashfield Council [2004] NSWLEC 259 CASES CITED: Renaldo Plus 3 Pty Ltd v Hurstville City Council [2005] NSWLEC 315 BGP Properties Limited v Lake Macquarie City Council [2004] NSWLEC 399 New Century Developments Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 154
DATES OF HEARING: 30 June 2009, 1 July 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24 July 2009
APPLICANT Mr G Green (Solicitor) SOLICITOR Pikes Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr I Hemmings (Barrister) SOLICITOR Mr G Christmas (Solicitor)
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
24 July 2009
10190 of 2009 Nicholas Procopiadis v Marrickville Council
JUDGMENT Background. 1 This appeal was lodged against the deemed refusal of a development application for alterations to an existing building to facilitate its use as a brothel and art/gallery workshop. The property is located at 66 Railway Street, Sydenham.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate