NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ergo Architecture and Interior v Woollahra Municipal Council [2007] NSWLEC 525
APPLICANT Ergo Architecture and Interior PARTIES : RESPONDENT Woollahra Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10134 of 2007
CORAM: Bly C - Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- two dwellings, boundary adjustment, demolition, landscape, harbour views, privacy, floor space ratio, excessive excavation, vehicular access and carparking, setbacks, height, fence and overshadowing.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995 Woollahra Residential Development Control Plan 2003
DATES OF HEARING: 5/06/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 5 June 2007
APPLICANT Mr V. Conomos, solicitor of Pike Pike and Fenwick LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr P. Rigg, solicitor of Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Bly C Thyer AC
5 June 2007
10134 of 2007 Ergo Architecture and Interior v Woollahra Municipal Council This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
JUDGMENT 1 This appeal relates to Development Application 432/2006/1, which is for a boundary adjustment, demolition of an existing dwelling house, and the erection of two new dwellings at 9 Bayview Hill Road, Rose Bay.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate