NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Stanton Dahl Architects v Penrith City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1204
APPLICANT Stanton Dahl Architects PARTIES : RESPONDENT Penrith City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10537 of 2008
CORAM: Tuor C - Sullivan AC
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- heritage incentives clause whether item of environmental heritage and development permissible affect on the amenity of the area from on site and traffic noise and impact on rural character KEY ISSUES: impact on heritage significance and whether conservation of item unlikely whether offsets adequate for impact on Cumberland Plain Woodland and Cumberland Plain Land Snail whether traffic works required
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Heritage Act 1977 LEGISLATION CITED: Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 13 - Mulgoa Valley Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 20 - Hawkesbury Nepean River Draft Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2008
Hallidays Point Developments Pty Ltd & Anor v Greater Taree City Council [2008] NSWLEC106 Currey v Hargraves & (2) Ors [2007] NSWLEC 471 CASES CITED: Baker Kavanagh Architects Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2004] NSWLEC 662 Mohamed El Dana v Bankstown City Council [2008] NSWLEC 1484 Gerroa Environment Protection Society Inc v Minister for Planning and Cleary Bros (Bombo) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWLEC 173
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate