NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic & Anor (No 7) [2010] NSWLEC 159 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT PARTIES : Baulkham Hills Shire Council RESPONDENT Milovan Stankovic
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41243 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: COSTS :- whether Court should exercise its discretion to award costs in relation to three Notices of Motion in civil enforcement proceedings finalised in 2008 - delay in seeking costs
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 56, s 58, s 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 36.17, r 42.1
Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic & Anor [2005] NSWLEC 110 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 870 CASES CITED: Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 3) [2008] NSWLEC 266 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 5) [2008] NSWLEC 327 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 6) [2010] NSWLEC 33
DATES OF HEARING: 12 March 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30 August 2010
APPLICANT Mr M Pearce (solicitor) SOLICITOR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: The Hills Shire Council
RESPONDENT In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
30 August 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate