NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Boers v Parramatta City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1071
APPLICANT John Boers PARTIES : RESPONDENT Parramatta City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10766 of 2009
CORAM: Moore SC
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- KEY ISSUES: Brothel Consistency with future character of area
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Sydney Regional Environment Plan No 28 - Parramatta
McInnes v Wingecarribee Shire Council [1997] 10 NSWLR 660 Wei v Parramatta City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1046 CASES CITED: Huang v Parramatta City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1401 Alphatex Australia v The Hills Shire Council (No. 2) [2009] NSWLEC 1126 Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614 BGP Properties Pty Ltd v Lake Macquarie City Council [2004] NSWLEC 399; (2004) 138 LGERA 237
DATES OF HEARING: 24 and 25 March 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 25 March 2010
APPLICANT Mr J Doyle, barrister LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Drury, solicitor Sparke Helmore
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC
25 March 2010
09/10766 Boers v Parramatta City Council
JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate