NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Fabcot v Maitland City Council [2007] NSWLEC 296
APPLICANT Fabcot Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Maitland City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11266 of 2006
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- modification of development consent for shopping centre - whether applicant should fully fund traffic signals - whether applicant should be given credit for road works
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
CASES CITED: McCarthy v Mulwaree Shire Council 78 LGERA 158
DATES OF HEARING: 19, 20/04/07
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29 May 2007
APPLICANT Mr R Lancaster, barrister SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jaques LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S Simmington, solicitor SOLICITORS Lindsay Taylor Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
29 May 2007
11266 of 2006 Fabcot Pty Limited v Maitland City Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the determination by Maitland City Council (the council) of an application to modify Development Application 06 – 780 under s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. This application received development consent for the demolition on an existing bowling alley and a number of specialty shops and their replacement with a Woolworths supermarket of 4200 square metres, seven new specialty shops with area of 1775 square metres, renovation of some existing specialty shops and 288 car parking spaces.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate