NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd v Pipven Pty Ltd [2009] NSWLEC 119
APPLICANT: Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT: Pipven Pty Ltd
PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT: Eric Bailey
THIRD RESPONDENT: Broxtan Pty Ltd
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Penrith City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40418 of 2009
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- application to vacate hearing date of class 4 proceedings challenging validity of development consent pending determination of fresh development application for consent.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 104A, 124(3)
CASES CITED: Sahade v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 62022 [2006] NSWLEC 770
DATES OF HEARING: 23 July 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24 July 2009
APPLICANT: Mr A. Bannon SC, Mr R. Lancaster SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jaques
FIRST RESPONDENT: Ms M. Allars SOLICITORS Deacons
SECOND RESPONDENT: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr M. Staunton SOLICITORS TressCox
THIRD RESPONDENT: Mr D. Miller SOLICITOR Swaab Attorneys
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Mr P. Vergotis (solicitor) SOLICITORS DLA Phillips Fox
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate