NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Barrak v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 528
APPLICANT Benjamin Barrak PARTIES : RESPONDENT Parramatta City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10067 of 2007
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- continued use of an existing cottage for commercial/retail purposes and the construction of five townhouses - conditions of approval
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 21/08/07
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 21 August 2007
APPLICANT Mr P Clay, barrister SOLICITORS Barrak Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Drury, solicitor SOLICITORS DLA Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
21 August 2007
10067 of 2007 Benjamin Barrak v Parramatta City Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Parramatta City Council (the council) of DA 618/2005 for the continued use of an existing cottage for commercial/retail purposes and the construction of five townhouses at 63 Victoria Rd., Parramatta (the site).
2 By way of background, the development application was lodged with the council on 12 July 2005 and was refused on 26 February 2006. The appeal against the refusal was filed with the Court on 27 January 2007. On 31 January 2007, the applicant lodged an application to review the previous decision of the council under s 82A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The s 82A revue application was not recommended for approval by council staff or an independent planning review however DA 618/2005 was approved by the council on 12 June. 2007.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate