NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 156 LGERA 446
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827
APPLICANT Joe Wehbe PARTIES : RESPONDENT Pittwater Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10744 of 2006
CORAM: Preston CJ
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- subdivision of residential land - breach of development standard prescribing minimum allotment size - applicant justified departure by reliance on existing use rights and SEPP 1 objection - subdivision itself is not use of land and does not effect a change in use - subdivision application therefore does not involve change from existing use to another use - development standard for subdivision does not derogate from incorporated provision allowing for change from an existing use to another use - SEPP 1 objection therefore necessary to be able to consent to subdivision - requirements to uphold SEPP 1 subdivision discussed - ways of establishing that compliance unreasonable or unnecessary discussed - SEPP 1 objection not well-founded in circumstances of the case - development consent refused
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 81A, s 97, s 106 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 11(2), cl 41(1) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39(6)
Auburn Municipal Council v F N Eckold Pty Ltd [1974] 2 NSWLR 148 affirmed (1975) 34 LGERA 114; Bowen v Willoughby City Council [2001] NSWLEC 274 (4 December 2001); City West Housing Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (1999) 110 LGERA 262; Colvest No. 27 Pty Ltd v Hastings Municipal Council, unreported, LEC No 10617 of 1986, 22 March 1988, Cripps J; Customs and Excise Commissioner v Viva Gas Appliances Ltd [1983] 1 WLR 1445; [1984] 1 All ER 112; Daniel v Manly Municipal Council (1975) 34 LGRA 14; Design 23 Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 125 LGERA 380; Drummoyne Municipal Council v Lebnan (1974) 131 CLR 350; Fastbuck$ v Byron Shire Council (1999) 103 LGERA 94; Gergely & Pinter v Woollahra Municipal Council (1984) 52 LGRA 400; CASES CITED: Hooker Corporation Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council (1986) 130 LGERA 438; Hooker-Rex Estates v Hornsby Shire Council, unreported, LEC No 10506 of 1982, 27 July 1983, Bignold J; Leighton Properties Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1998) 98 LGERA 382; Legal and General Life of Australia Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1989) 68 LGRA 192; Lyne v Moree Plains Shire Council (1999) 110 LGERA 120; Memel Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2000) 110 LGERA 217; Nancy Shetland Pty Ltd v Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works (1974) 34 LGRA 151; North Shore Gas Co. Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council, unreported, LEC No 10185 of 1986, 15 September 1986, Stein J; North Sydney Municipal Council v Parlby, unreported, LEC No. 10613 of 1985, 13 November 1986, Stein J; SCMP Properties Pty Limited v North Sydney Municipal Council (1983) 130 LGERA 351; Smith v Randwick Municipal Council (1950) 17 LGR (NSW) 246; Winten Property Group Ltd v North Sydney Council (2001) 130 LGERA 79
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate