NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) 151 LGERA 207
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : James Godfrey v Wollondilly Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 33
APPLICANT James Godfrey PARTIES : RESPONDENT Wollondilly Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10865 of 2006
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- permissible development - rural industry - earthmoving establishment - retail plant nursery - consistency with zone objectives - impacts of development - proposed ameliorative measures
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury Nepean River Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 1991
Australian Native Landscapes Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [1998] NSWLEC 31; Domachuk v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (1992) 77 LGRA 395; Egan and Others v Hawkesbury City Council and Another (1993) 79 LGERA 321; Hawkesbury City Council and Another v Sammut (2002) 119 LGERA 171; CASES CITED: Jonah Pty Limited v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 99; Mittagong Mushrooms Pty Ltd and Another v Narrambulla Action Group Inc and Another (1998) 97 LGERA 333; North Sydney Municipal Council v Boyts Radio & Electrical Pty Ltd and Others (1989) 16 NSWLR 50; Renaldo Plus 3 Pty Limited v Hurstville City Council [2005] NSWLEC 315; Royal Agricultural Society of New South Wales v Sydney City Council (1987) 61 LGRA 305
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate