NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Fiene v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2010] NSWLEC 1226
APPLICANT Gary and Desiree Fiene PARTIES : RESPONDENT Leichhardt Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10355 of 2010
CORAM: Tuor C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT CONSENT :- s96 application to delete condition. Impact of changes on heritage significance of the conservation area.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000
DATES OF HEARING: 27/07/2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 27 July 2010
APPLICANT Mr A Seton, solicitor Marsdens Law Group LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Ms J Walsh, solicitor Pikes Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
27 July 2010
10355 of 2010 Fiene v Leichhardt Council This determination was given extemporaneously and has been edited prior to publication
JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal against the refusal by Leichhardt Council (council) of an application under s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) to modify development consent (D/2007/324) for alterations and additions at 2 Cove Street, Birchgrove. 2 The development consent includes Condition 2(a), which requires the deletion of a proposed dormer window fronting Cove Street. The s 96 application is seeking to: (a) delete Condition 2(a) and retain the front dormer window to the storage attic;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate