NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Morrison v Mahon [2007] NSWLEC 416 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
PROSECUTOR: Anthony Morrison PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Danny Mahon
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50014 of 2006
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- sentence - plea of guilty to a marine pollution charge - extent and cause of discharge of oil - whether "act" includes omission in s 8A Marine Pollution Act 1987 - whether charge limited to one act causing one discharge - whether charge otherwise impermissibly duplicitous - sentencing considerations - result offence - potential for result to occur cannot be taken into account on sentencing but proper to take into account when exercising statutory discretion whether to dismiss proceedings without proceeding to conviction - whether higher penalties ordinarily result where parliament has increased maximum penalty - parity of sentencing
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 10, 21A(3), 22 Marine Pollution Act 1987 s 8A
Barbara Filipowski v Vopak Terminals Sydney Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 104; Cabonne Shire Council v Environment Protection Authority (2001) 115 LGERA 304; Director of Public Prosecutions v Merriman [1973] AC 584; Environment Protection Authority v Middle Harbour Constructions Pty Ltd (2002) 119 LGERA 440; Ex parte Fitzgerald; Re Gordon (1945) 45 SR (NSW) 182; Filipowski v Arta Adhisatya Pte Ltd and Sahea [2002] NSWLEC 169; Filipowski v Cadem Shipping Pty Ltd & Anor [2005] NSWLEC 552; Filipowski v Dayton Corporation (2004) 138 LGERA 150; Filipowski v De Ocampo [1998] NSWLEC 119; Filipowski v Fratelli D'Amato S.r.l and Others (2000) 108 LGERA 88; Filipowski v Frey [2005] NSWLEC 661; Filipowski v Island Maritime Ltd; Majgaonkar [2005] NSWLEC 73; Filipowski v Mediterranean Shipping Co SA and Ors [2005] NSWLEC 159; Filipowski v Schiffsbeteiligungsges m.b.H & Co KG (2004) 134 LGERA 48; Filipowski v Wallenius Lines Singapore Pte Ltd & Anor [2002] NSWLEC 14; Hoogendoorn v MISR Shipping Company and Hassan [2001] NSWLEC 171; CASES CITED: Krakouer v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 202; Morrison v Che Mat and Others (1997) 95 LGERA 212; Morrison v Peacock and Roslyndale Shipping Co Pty Limited [2003] NSWLEC 68; Pace Farm Egg Products Pty Ltd v Newcastle City Council (2006) 151 LGERA 260; Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; R v Hamzy (1994) 74 A Crim R 341; R v Howard (1992) 29 NSWLR 242; R v Li [2005] NSWCCA 154; R v Moussad (1999) 152 FLR 373; R v Phillips (1971) 45 ALJR 467; R v Slattery (1996) 90 A Crim R 519; R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; R v Wilson (1979) 69 Cr App Rep 83; S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266; Thorneloe v Filipowski [2001] NSWCCA 213, (2001) 52 NSWLR 60; Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77; Webb v Chung & Ors [2002] NSWLEC 135; Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate