NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mosca v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW [2007] NSWLEC 664
APPLICANT: Franco Mosca PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30121 of 2003
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Evidence :- whether leave should be granted to adduce further evidence after Court of Appeal remits resumption proceedings for compensation to be assessed according to law
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 94, 94EB(1) Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 s 56(1)
De L v Director-General New South Wales Department of Community Services [No 2] (1997) 190 CLR 207; D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1 ; Histollo Pty Limited v Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife Service [1997] NSWLEC 209; Histollo Pty Limited v Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife Service [1997] NSWLEC 210; CASES CITED: Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Ltd v Gosford City Council (1981) 27 The Valuer 214 ; Morison v Commonwealth (1971) 34 LGRA 273 ; Mosca v Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) (2004) 139 LGERA 28; Mosca v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW [2007] NSWLEC 79; Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Mosca (2006) 146 LGERA 335; Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v Housing Commission of NSW (Cripps J, NSWLEC, 17 March 1982 unreported)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate