NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Gray and Anor v Macquarie Generation (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 82
FIRST APPLICANT Peter Robert Gray PARTIES : SECOND APPLICANT Naomi Crystal Hodgson RESPONDENT Macquarie Generation
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40500 of 2009
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: COSTS :- whether departure from usual costs rule justified - partially successful strike out application - whether litigation can be characterised as public interest litigation - whether there are any countervailing considerations
Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 4.2(1), r 4.2(2) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.1
Caroona Coal Action Group Inc v Coal Mines Australia Pty Limited (No 3) [2010] NSWLEC 59 Engadine Area Traffic Action Group Inc v Sutherland Shire Council (No 2) [2004] NSWLEC 434; (2004) 136 LGERA 365 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 CASES CITED: Gray and Anor v Macquarie Generation [2010] NSWLEC 34 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Save the Ridge Inc v Commonwealth of Australia [2006] FCAFC 51; (2006) 230 ALR 411 Sharples v Minister for Local Government [2010] NSWCA 36 Van Son v Forestry Commission of New South Wales (1995) 86 LGERA 108
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate