NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rundle v Tweed Shire Council & Anor [1988] NSWLEC 155 APPLICANT Rundle PARTIES : RESPONDENT Tweed Shire Council & Anor FILE NUMBER(S) : 40241 of 1987 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: :- LEGISLATION CITED: Commonwealth Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Act 1988 Sankey v. Whitlam (1978); Alister v. R (1983); Alfred Crompton Amusements Machines Ltd v. Customs and Excise Commissioners (1974); CASES CITED: Norwich Pharmacal v. Customs and Excise Commissioners (1974); Campbell v. Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (1987); Aboriginal Sacred Sites Protection Authority v. Maurice (1986); Barton v. Csidei (1979) DATES OF HEARING: 20/12/88 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/20/1988
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
JUDGMENT:
Bignold J.: This is a Notice of Motion by a stranger to the proceedings to be excused from producing documents the subject of a subpoena duces tecum.
On 4th November, 1988 the Applicant served a subpoena on the Secretary of the Commonwealth Department of Community Services and Health requiring the production to this Court on 15th November, 1988 of the following documents:-
"All documents, reports, articles or other writings in its possession custody or control relating to the environmental and health effects of the herbicide 2,4-D."
By paragraph 2 of his Notice of Motion filed on 15th November, 1988 the Secretary of the aforesaid Commonwealth Department sought to be excused from producing specified documents on the ground of public interest immunity.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate