NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wollongong City Council v Ensile Pty Limited; Wollongong City Council v Hogarth (No 5) [2008] NSWLEC 150
PROSECUTOR Wollongong City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANTS Ensile Pty Limited Robert Martin (aka Bob) Hogarth
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50019 of 2007; 50021 of 2007; 50047 of 2007; 50048 of 2007
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- claim for privilege - whether prosecutor's claim can be maintained against defendant - s123 Evidence Act - adducing evidence - call for production - privilege lost by reason of s123
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 Legal Aid Act 1977 (ACT)
Akins v Abigroup Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 539 Carter v The Managing Partner, Northmore Hale Davey and Leake (1995) 183 CLR 121 Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) v Kane (1997) 140 FLR 468 Esso Australia Resources Limited v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 201 CLR 49 CASES CITED: R v Pearson (Unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, Court of Criminal Appeal, Gleeson CJ, Smart and Sully JJ, 5 March 1996) R v Petroulias (No 22) [2007] NSWSC 692 Re Doran Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (2002) 194 ALR 101 The Queen v Barton [1973] 1 WLR 115 Waind v Hill (1978) 1 NSWLR 372 Williams v The Queen (2000) 119 A Crim R 490
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate