NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Gauci v Ioannou [2009] NSWLEC 1419
APPLICANT Martin Gauci v PARTIES : RESPONDENT Cris and Androulla Ioannou
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20724 of 2009
CORAM: Fakes C
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- Removal of tree, damage to property and risk of injury to people.
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592
DATES OF HEARING: 10 December 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18 December 2009
APPLICANT Martin Gauci v LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Cris and Androulla Ioannou
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes C
18 December 2009
20724 of 2009 Martin Gauci v Cris and Androulla Ioannou
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an applicant pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 made by Mr Martin Gauci of 108a Harvey Road Kings Park against the owners of a tree located at the rear of 46 Cobham Street Kings Park. The owners of that property are Mr and Mrs Ioannou. Mrs Claire Gauci attended the on-site hearing; Mrs Ioannou was unable to do so.
2 The applicant is seeking the removal of the tree as he contends that the tree poses a risk of injury to people. He contends that branches from the tree have caused damage to his property and will continue to do so.
3 The tree is a dead Eucalypt of approximately 20 m in height located in the rear north-western corner of the respondents' property between a chook shed and the rear boundary fence. The applicant's property is to the rear of the respondents' property. The tree is also close to the boundary with the northern neighbours of both the applicant and the respondents and effectively overhangs four properties.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate