NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Grima v Holroyd City Council [2007] NSWLEC 759
APPLICANT Val and Marian Grima PARTIES : RESPONDENT Holroyd City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10151 of 2007
CORAM: Tuor C
Development Application :- alterations and additions to an existing childcare centre to increase the number of children KEY ISSUES: impact on residential amenity and streetscape noise, carparking and open space.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 1991
DATES OF HEARING: 22/08/2007 and 10/10/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10 October 2007
APPLICANT Mr C. Gough, solicitor of Storey and Gough LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr G. McKee, solicitor of McKees
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
10 October 2007
10151of 2007 Val and Marian Grima v Holroyd City Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the deemed refusal by Holroyd City Council (the council) of a Development Application (DA450/2007) under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to demolish an existing dwelling and for alterations and additions to an existing childcare centre to increase the number of children from 29 to 74 at 56 Hampden Road, Wentworthville. 2 The site, its context, the history of the proposal and the planning controls are in the Statement of Facts and Contentions prepared by the council and filed on 4 June 2007. 3 The main issue in dispute between the parties was that the proposed increase in the number of children does not comply with cl 9 of Holroyd Development Control Plan No 27 - Guidelines for Development of Childcare Centres (DCP 27) which provides:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate