NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Pikoulas v Canterbury City Council (No.4) [2008] NSWLEC 166
APPLICANT PARTIES : Aristomenis Pikoulas RESPONDENT Canterbury City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10619 of 2007
CORAM: Sheahan J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- whether it is fair and reasonable to make a costs order
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council (2005) 142 LGERA 141 Arden Anglican School v Hornsby Shire Council [2008] NSWLEC 103 Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70 Halstead & Anor v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 346 Holroyd City Council v Kubacki & Anor [2007] NSWLEC 804 Kogarah Council v McNicol [2001] NSWLEC 11 CASES CITED: Pikoulas v Canterbury City Council [2007] NSWLEC 648 Pikoulas v Canterbury City Council [2007] NSWLEC 747 Pikoulas v Canterbury City Council [2008] NSWLEC 77 Port Stephens Council v Sansom (2007) 156 LGERA 125 Radray Constructions Pty Limited v Hornsby Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 132 Thaina Town (On Goulburn) Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (2007) 156 LGERA 150 The Warehouse Pty Ltd & Anor v City of Sydney Council [2007] NSWLEC 488
DATES OF HEARING: 6 May 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 6 May 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate