NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wheeler v McDonald [2007] NSWLEC 383
APPLICANT Shaun Wheeler PARTIES : RESPONDENT Geoff McDonald
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20181 of 2007
CORAM: Hussey C - Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) :- Potential damage to property, injury to persons and overhanging branches.
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 18/06/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 18 June 2007
APPLICANT Mr S. Wheeler, litigant in person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr G. McDonald, litigant in person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C Thyer AC
18 June 2007
20181 of 2007 Shaun Wheeler v Geoff McDonald This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. JUDGMENT Background 1 This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Dispute Between Neighbours) Act 2006 concerning a tree located on a property at 28 First Avenue, Erowal Bay. The property is owned by Mr McDonald and the tree is a mature Spotted Gum.
2 The application has been made by Mr S. Wheeler from No. 30 First Avenue, who seeks orders from the Court firstly; that the branches that are overhanging the common boundary of the shed be pruned to stop dropping branch damage to the shed and possible injury to persons. Secondly, rectification be undertaken to the fence alignment occasioned by tree movement. Tree Disputes Between Neighbours Act 2006. (Act) 3 The relevant provisions of s 10(2)(a) of the Act require the Court to be satisfied that one or more of the following four conditions are met with respect to any trees subject to the application, before the Court has jurisdiction to consider the application concerning the tree. The tests are: 1. Has the tree caused damage to the applicant's property?
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate