NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Director-General, Department of Natural Resources v Gleeson; Director-General, Department of Natural Resources v Epacris Pty Ltd [2007] NSWLEC 749
50068 of 2005 PROSECUTOR Director-General, Department of Natural Resources DEFENDANT David John Gleeson PARTIES : 50069 OF 2005 PROSECUTOR Director-General, Department of Natural Resources DEFENDANT Epacris Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50068 of 2005; 50069 of 2005
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- case stated procedure - whether questions of law arising at or in reference to the proceedings - questions contingent - hypothetical - application refused
Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Native Vegetation Conservation Act 1997
ADI Limited v Environmental Protection Authority (2000) 118 A Crim R 335 ; Budget Nursery Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1989) 42 A Crim R 81 ; Chugg v Pacific Dunlop Limited (1990) 170 CLR 249; Director General, Department of Land and Water Conservation v Bailey (2003) 136 LGERA 242; Director General of Department of Land and Water Conservation v Pye [1998] NSWLEC 292; Director-General, Department of Planning v Epacris Pty Limited (2006) 147 LGERA 372; Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 1999 (1999) 128 NTR 1; (1999) 105 A Crim R 489; Director of Public Prosecutions v Cassell (1995) 80 A Crim R 160 ; Director of Public Prosecutions v G (1999) 85 FCR 566; Director of Public Prosecutions, South Australia v B (1998) 194 CLR 566 ; CASES CITED: DPP (NSW) v United Telecasters Sydney Limited (1990) 168 CLR 594 ; Environment Protection Authority v Land and Environment Court (NSW) (2004) 134 LGERA 140; Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation Limited (1997) 98 LGERA 361 ; Epacris Pty Limited v Director-General, Department of Natural Resources (2007) 153 LGERA 173; (2007) 170 A Crim R 542; R v Chin (1985) 157 CLR 671; R v Diakakis (1952) 52 SR (NSW) 15 ; R v Dittmar [1973] 1 NSWLR 722; R v Jesson [1973] 1 NSWLR 726 ; R v Nixon (2000) 181 ALR 747 ; The Australian Commonwealth Shipping Board v The Federated Seamen's Union of Australia (1925) 36 CLR 442 ; Vines v Djordjevitch (1950) 91 CLR 512; Young v Campbell (1948) 49 SR (NSW) 103
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate