NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Abernethy Developments Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1079 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Abernethy Developments Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Cessnock City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10679 of 2008
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- subdivision, bushfire risk, adequacy of services, drainage, character of development, public interest.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cessnock Local Environmental Plan 1989 LEGISLATION CITED: Cessnock Development Control Plan 2006 State Environmental Planning Policy 55 – Remediation of land. Hunter Regional Environmental Plan 1989. Hunter Regional Environmental Plan 1989 Heritage
DATES OF HEARING: 3/02/2009 and 4/02/2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13 March 2009
APPLICANT Mr G. McKee, solicitor of McKees Legal Solutions LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr R. Mallik, solicitor of Mallik Rees
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
13 March 2009
10679 of 2008 Abernethy Developments Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council
JUDGMENT Background. 1 This appeal was lodged against council refusal of a development application for a subdivision to create 11 new residential allotments at Munn Street, Abernethy. A number of issues were initially identified for the appeal, but after conferencing by the parties, these were subsequently reduced to the following: o Insufficient details concerning drainage flow paths, location of existing vegetation, location of bushfire water tanks and new road details. o Flooding and stormwater disposal arrangements. o Impact on EEC o Bushfire risks. o Availability of services, particularly water supply. o Visual impacts. o Adequacy of proposed access road system. o Public interest in terms of bushfire risk, water supply, compatibility of the development with the character of the development and amenity impacts on the historical Abernethy Guest House. 2 However, at the commencement of the proceedings the Court was informed that the parties agreed to consent orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate