NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : S J Connelly Pty Ltd v Clarence Valley Council [2009] NSWLEC 1129
APPLICANT S J Connelly Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Clarence Valley Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10063 of 2009
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS - SECTION 96 MODIFICATION :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Northern Rivers Local Government Development Design and Construction Manual
DATES OF HEARING: 22 April 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 23 April 2009
APPLICANT Mr Stephen Connelly, Litigant in Person
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr David Pickering, Solicitor of Pickering Priestley Solicitors
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
23 April 2009
10063 of 2009 S J Connelly Pty Ltd -v- Clarence Valley Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: The applicant in these proceedings submitted a s96 application to the Council seeking a modification to the conditions of consent granted by the Council to a development application for a canal development of 269 lots in what is known as Yamba Quays.
2 The parties have come here today with consent orders agreeing to the deletion of condition 33 of development consent number 1973/92 and an amendment to condition 15. There are no objectors to the proposed modification and I see no reason as to why the Court should not agree to the consent orders.
3 Since development consent was granted to the subdivision over 100 lots have been registered and the canals and associated revetment walls have been completely constructed. The applicant contends that given that the site is now in a physical state requiring minimal further work in terms of infrastructure condition 33 is unnecessary and Council agrees that it can be deleted from the development consent.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate