NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rich v Lennox Palms Estate and Anor [2009] NSWLEC 167
APPLICANTS Alan Rich & Evelyn Rich PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Lennox Palms Estate SECOND RESPONDENT Ballina Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40275 of 2009
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT CONSENT :- construction of development consent - whether development consent properly commenced - whether consent provided for staged development of subdivision - whether breach of consent in failure to extend public road access to boundary of applicants' land
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 123
Auburn Municipal Council v Szabo (1971) 67 LGRA 427 Neighbourhood Association DP 285249 v Watson (2008) 162 LGERA 322 House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council (2000) 48 NSWLR 498 CASES CITED: Rao v Canterbury City Council (2000) 112 LGERA 360 Ryde Municipal Council v The Ryde Royal Homes (1970) 19 LGRA 321 Tipfast Pty Ltd v South Sydney Council [2002] NSWLEC 85 Westfield Management Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [2006] NSWCA 245
TEXTS CITED: The Macquarie Dictionary, 3rd ed (Macquarie University, Sydney: The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, 2001)
DATES OF HEARING: 22 September 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25 September 2009
APPLICANTS Mr D Wilson SOLICITORS McCartney Young Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: FIRST RESPONDENT Mr N Bilinsky SOLICITORS Stafford Lawyers SECOND RESPONDENT Submitting appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate