NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Clemson v Freeburn [2010] NSWLEC 1298
APPLICANT Mrs J Clemson PARTIES : RESPONDENT Mrs S Freeburn
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20630 of 2010
CORAM: Fakes C - Galwey AC
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- Consent Orders; damage to property, injury to persons
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 29/10/10
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29 October 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 29 October 2010
APPLICANT Mr M Robach [agent]
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr M Mulock [solicitor] SOLICITORS Burston, Cole & Mulock Pty Limited
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes C Galwey AC
29 October 2010
20630 of 2010 Clemson v Freeburn
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONERS: This is an application pursuant to Part 2 s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act) made by the owner of a property in Penrith against the owner of trees growing on an adjoining property. The applicant was represented by her son-in-law Mr Robach and the respondent by her solicitor Mr Mulock. 2 The applicant contends that the trees have caused damage to her property and pose a risk of injury to persons. She also seeks compensation for the damaged property. 3 The orders sought by the applicant are the maintenance of the trees including the installation of a root barrier or the removal of the trees. These orders are sought in order to prevent further damage. The applicant would prefer the trees to remain. 4 The application arose as a result of an incident where a visitor to the applicant's property tripped on a raised section of concrete and threatened to take legal action against the applicant. The unevenness of the paving has also limited access to the site by the applicant's wheelchair-bound grandson.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate