NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sumner v Graham [2008] NSWLEC 1391
APPLICANT Shirley Sumner PARTIES : RESPONDENT Robert and Carmel Graham
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20410 of 2008
CORAM: Fakes AC
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) :- Removal of the tree and damage to property
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592
DATES OF HEARING: 29/09/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 29 September 2008
APPLICANT Ms S. Sumner, litigant in person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr R. and Mrs C. Graham, litigants in person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes AC
29 September 2008
20410 of 2008 Shirley Sumner v Robert and Carmel Graham
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 ACTING COMMISSIONER: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 made by Ms Shirley Sumner of 19 Tracey Avenue Carlingford regarding a tree located at the rear of the adjoining property owned by Mr and Mrs Graham of 21 Tracey Avenue Carlingford.
2 The tree is a small healthy Camphor Laurel (Cinnamomum camphora) of approximately 4 m high located within about 500 mm of the boundary fence between the applicant and the respondents. The tree partially overhangs and contacts the rear corner of Ms Sumner's house in which the laundry and a toilet are located. The tree has a minor bark inclusion between its two leaders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate