NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council [1988] NSWLEC 19 APPLICANT Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Warringah Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10490 of 1987 CORAM: Cripps J KEY ISSUES: :- LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, 1980. Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty. Limited v. Canterbury Municipal Council, 50 LGRA 1; CASES CITED: Food Plus v. Warringah Shire Council, 50 LGRA 76; Golden Fleece Petroleum Pty. Limited v. Rockdale Municipal Council, 52 LGRA 202; Food Plus Pty. Limited v. Warringah Shire Council, (1983) DATES OF HEARING: DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/01/1988
APPLICANT Mr. Thompson LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr. Tobias
JUDGMENT:
His Honour: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s.56A of the Land and Environment Court Act against the decision of Assessor Jensen published on 12 February 1988.
The grounds of appeal are:
1. That the Assessor erred in law in holding that the development proposed constituted an existing use change to another use in accordance with cl. 51(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, 1980.
2. The Assessor erred in law in finding that the provision of an acoustic barrier between the subject land and the premises, No. 1513 Pittwater Road, should be the subject of the orders of the Court yet failed to impose a condition of consent requiring provision of such a barrier.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate