NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Trinity Grammar School v Ashfield Council [2007] NSWLEC 733 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
Applicant: Council of Trinity Grammar School PARTIES : Respondent: Ashfield Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10192 of 2007
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application - Swimming Pools :- heritage impact, parking, power to impose conditions
LEGISLATION CITED: Ashfield Local Environmental Plan 1985
Winten Property Group Ltd v North Sydney Council [2001] NSWLEC 46; PYX Granite Company Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government and Another [1958] 1QB 554; Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578; Building Owners and Managers Association of Australia Ltd v Sydney City Council [1984] 53 LGRA 54; Parramatta City Council v Peterson [1987] LGRA 61; Allen Commercial Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council [1970] 20 LGRA 208; CASES CITED: Waverley Municipal Council v P E Bakers Pty Ltd [1985] 54 LGRA 309; Toadolla Co Pty Ltd v Dumaresq Shire Council [1992] 78 LGRA 261; Mison v Randwick Council [1991] 23 NSWLR 734; Carr v Minister for Land and Water Conservation [1998] 109 LGERA 175; Mirvac Projects v Sydney City Council [2003] 131 LGERA 363; Caringbah Investments Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [1970] 20 LGRA 377; George Brand Real Estate Pty Ltd v Gosford City Council [1995] NSWLEC 230; Hill v Blacktown City Council [2007] NSWLEC 401.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate