NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Gracewood Australia Pty Ltd v State Water Corporation [2008] NSWLEC 292
APPLICANT: Gracewood Australia Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: State Water Corporation
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10646 of 2008
CORAM: Biscoe J
Jurisdiction :- respondent issued statement to applicant that applicant had used virtually all of its annual water allocation under licence issued under Water Act 1912 (NSW) - whether applicant's claim for alleged resultant lost opportunity of selling water allocation is within the jurisdiction of the Court. KEY ISSUES: Costs:- where proceedings purportedly brought in Classes 1, 2 and 3 of the Court's jurisdiction are outside jurisdiction and disclose no reasonable cause of action.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), ss 16, 17, 19(h), 20, 23, Pt 3 Div 1 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW), r 3.7 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.4 Water Act 1912 (NSW), ss 11(4), 12, 13A(4), 14(2), Pt 2 Div 3
National Parks and Wildlife Service v Stables Perisher Pty Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 573 Neighbourhood Association DP 285121 v Murray Shire Council (2001) 117 LGERA 95 CASES CITED: Newcastle City Council v Caverstock Group Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 249 Nix and Dunn v Pittwater Council (1994) 84 LGERA 199 Porter v Hunters Hill Council (2003) 131 LGERA 144 Scharer v State of New South Wales (2001) 53 NSWLR 299
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate