NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ratay v Allen [2010] NSWLEC 1086
APPLICANTS P & M Ratay PARTIES : RESPONDENT A Allen
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20070 of 2010
CORAM: Moore SC
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Dooley & anor v Nevell [2007] NSWLEC 715
DATES OF HEARING: 13 April 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 13 April 2010
APPLICANTS In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT No appearance
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC
13 April 2010
10/20070 Ratay v Allen
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: This application is made pursuant to the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 concerning the roots of two Liquidambar trees located on the adjacent property to the north of the applicants' property. The more southern of these two trees overhangs the applicants' property and has an obviously extensive root system that is suckering shoots in the applicants' property. The second tree is some 15 m further to the north.
2 I have carefully examined various branch attachments that I can see on these trees (as I do not have access to the tree property as the respondent has not attended the hearing). There is no indication of likely structural failure of any observable element.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate