NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2007) 151 LGERA 385
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Marinkovic v Rockdale City Council [2007] NSWLEC 71
APPLICANT Milano Marinkovic PARTIES : RESPONDENT Rockdale City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11622 of 2004
CORAM: Preston CJ
Appeal :- amendment - leave sought - improved community outcome KEY ISSUES: Costs:- planning appeal - leave granted to amend - amendment part of usual conduct of appeal - no order as to costs
Land and Environment Court Act (1979) s 69 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules (1996) Pt 16 r 4(2) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW)
Marinkovic v Rockdale City Council [2006] NSWLEC 601; Hunter Development Brokerage Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council [No.2] [2006] NSWCA 292; CASES CITED: Residents Against Improper Development Incorporated v Chase Property Investments Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 323; Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council (2005) 142 LGERA 141; Millenium Projects Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 761; Vigor Master Pty Limited v Warringah Council [2006] NSWLEC 140
DATES OF HEARING: 7 February 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 7 February 2007
APPLICANT Mr P Tomasetti (Barrister) SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: D.C Balog & Associates RESPONDENT Mr J Cole (Solicitor) Abbott Tout Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate