NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Campbell v Rahme [2009] NSWLEC 1315
APPLICANT Reginald Campbell PARTIES : RESPONDENT Daniel Rahme
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20440 of 2009
CORAM: Fakes AC
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- removal of the tree, damage to property and injury to people
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292
DATES OF HEARING: 18 September 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 18 September 2009
APPLICANT Reginald Campbell (litigant in person) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Daniel Rahme (litigant in person)
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes AC 18 September 2009
20440 of 2009 Reginald Campbell v Daniel Rahme
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 ACTING COMMISSIONER: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 made by Mr Reginald Campbell of 11 Mills Crescent Burwood against the owner of a tree growing at 11 Selborne Street Burwood. The owner of that property is Mr Daniel Rahme. Mrs Rhonda Campbell acted as Mr Campbell's agent for these proceedings. Burwood Council was represented by Mr Joe Lilley, Tree Management Officer.
2 At the on site hearing, I disclosed to all parties that in the past I lived across the road from 11 Selborne Street and that I was on speaking terms with the previous owner of no. 11 and with Mr Rahme's father who lives at no. 9 Selborne Street. However, I had never entered 11 Selborne Street. All parties agreed that I continue to hear the matter.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate