NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Marzouk Sam v Penrith City Council [2007] NSWLEC 415
APPLICANT Marzouk Sam PARTIES : RESPONDENT Penrith City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10550 of 2006
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Whether clause in LEP is development standard or prohibition. Development standard - whether clause referable to essential elements of the development - amounts to prohibition.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 s 76B LEGISLATION CITED: Penrith Local Environmental Plan No. 52 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1
Blue Mountains City Council v Laurence Browning Pty Ltd (2006) 150 LGERA 130; DEM (Australia) Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2004) 136 LGERA 187; CASES CITED: Hecar Investments No. 6 Pty Ltd v Lake Macquarie Municipal Council (1984) 53 LGRA 322; Retirement by Design Pty Limited v Warringah Council (2007) NSWLEC 87 ; Strathfield Municipal Council v Poynting (2001) 116 LGERA 319; Woollahra Municipal Council v Carr (1985) 62 LGERA 263
DATES OF HEARING: 04/07/07
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11 July 2007
APPLICANT Mr Johnson (Barrister) SOLICITORS Storey & Gough LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr Galasso SC SOLICITORS DLA Phillips Fox
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate