NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Causmag Ore Company Proprietary Limited [2009] NSWLEC 164
PROSECUTOR PARTIES : Environment Protection Authority DEFENDANT Causmag Ore Company Proprietary Limited
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50025 of 2009
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: PROSECUTION :- sentence - breach of environment protection licence condition - failure to maintain filter bags in proper and efficient manner in order to prevent escape of dust - no environmental harm other than short-term amenity impacts - reasonably serious failure to properly maintain filter bags - resulting harm reasonably foreseeable - whether defendant continued production for commercial reasons while on notice of licence breach - two previous convictions for similar offences - mitigating factors - consideration of defendant's means to pay - publication order and order for contribution to environmental project made
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 3A, 21A, 22, 23 Clean Air Act 1961 s 14 (repealed) Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989 (repealed) LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Evidence Act 1995 s 87(1)(b) Fines Act 1996 s 6 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 64, 241, 250
Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357 Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Ltd (2006) 145 LGERA 234 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 EPA v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 Environment Protection Authority v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Limited (NSWLEC, Talbot J, 19 April 2000, unreported) Environment Protection Authority v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 46 Environment Protection Authority v Causmag Ore Company Pty Ltd [2000] NSWLEC 20 Environment Protection Authority v Coastal Recycled Cooking Oils Pty Limited [2008] NSWLEC 242 Environment Protection Authority v Delta Electricity [2009] NSWLEC 11 Environment Protection Authority v Douglass (No 2) [2002] NSWLEC 94 Environment Protection Authority v Forgacs Engineering Pty Limited [2009] NSWLEC 64 CASES CITED: Environment Protection Authority v Incitec Limited [2003] NSWLEC 381 Environment Protection Authority v Lithgow Coal Company Pty Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 430 Environment Protection Authority v Rethmann Australia Environmental Services [2003] NSWLEC 351 Environment Protection Authority v Shoalhaven Starches Pty Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 107 Environment Protection Authority v Virotec International Limited [2002] NSWLEC 110 Environment Protection Authority v Werris Creek Coal Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v Holley [2009] NSWLEC 124 Gittany Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2006) 145 LGERA 189 Gosford City Council v Australian Panel Products Pty Ltd [2009] NSWLEC 77 Hoare v R (1989) 167 CLR 348 R v Rahme (1989) 43 A Crim R 81 R v Sharma (2002) 54 NSWLR 300 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Veen v The Queen [No. 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate