NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [2009] NSWLEC 225
APPLICANT: Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Valuer-General
FILE NUMBER(S) : 31205 of 2008; 31206 of 2008
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: VALUATION OF LAND :- appeal from Valuer General's land value assessments - industrial land
Blacktown Local Environment Plan 1988 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 75J, Part 3A Valuation of Land Act 1916, ss 6A(1), 37(1), 40
CASES CITED: McKee v Valuer-General [1971] NZLR 436
DATES OF HEARING: 2 - 4 November 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24 December 2009
APPLICANT: Mr G. Colman SOLICITORS: DibbsBarker LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr J. Maston SOLICITORS: Crown Solicitor's Office (NSW)
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
BISCOE J
24 December 2009
31205 and 31206 of 2008
HOLCIM (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD v VALUER-GENERAL
JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: These are two appeals by Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd against the Valuer-General's assessments of the land value of its vacant industrial land at 21 Kellogg Road, Rooty Hill, being Lot 5 in DP 255515 (Land). The statutory assessments were $17,500,000 (representing $190/m2 x 91,944 m2 of developable land) and $18,800,000 ($204/m2 x 91,944 m2) at the respective base dates of 1 July 2006 and 1 July 2007. 2 The applicant submits, based on its valuation evidence, that: (a) the 2006 land value should be assessed at $12,800,900 ($175/m 2 x 73,148m 2 ) for the northern portion of the Land plus a nominal sum of $40,000 for the southern portion; (b) the 2007 land value should be assessed at $14,629,600 ($200/m 2 x 73,148m 2 ) for the northern portion of the Land plus a nominal sum of $50,000 for the southern portion;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate