NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 155 LGERA 291
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cracknell and Lonergan Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney [2007] NSWLEC 392
APPLICANT Cracknell and Lonergan Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Council of the City of Sydney
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11052 of 2006
CORAM: Preston CJ
KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- right of way burdening land to be developed - statutory provision suspending application of specified regulatory instruments to enable development to be carried out - specified regulatory instruments are "any covenant, agreement or similar instrument that purports to impose restrictions on the carrying out of development on land" - whether deed creating right of way is such a specified regulatory instrument
Conveyancing Act 1919 s88, s88(1), s88E, s88K, s89 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 28(1), s28(2) s78A(1), s79C(1)(b)-(e), s97, Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39(4) Real Property Act 1900, s42(1) (a1),
Al-Kateb v Goodwin (2004) 219 CLR 562; Application of Thompson, unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 25 October 1993; Chui v Healey (2003) 11 BPR 21, 241; [2003] NSWSC 857; Challister Ltd v Blacktown City Council (1992) 76 LGERA 10; Clissold v Perry (1904) 1 CLR 363; Clunies Ross v The Commonwealth (1984) 155 CLR 193; Cogente Pty Limited v Doe (1998) 98 LGERA 162; Coles Supermarket v Minister (1996) 90 LGERA 341; Doe v Cogente Pty Ltd (1997) 94 LGERA 305; Donald Crone & Associates Pty Ltd v Bathurst City Council [1988] NSWLEC 73 (19 October 1998); Dresdner v Scida [2003] NSWSC 957; CASES CITED: Lodhi v Regina (2006) 199 FLR 303; [2006] NSWCCA 121; Ludwig v Coshott (1994) 83 LGERA 22 (Bryson J) and Court of Appeal, unreported, 13 February 1997; Marjen Pty Ltd v Coles Supermarkets Pty Ltd (1996) 90 LGERA 363; Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Sydney Water Corporation (2004) 138 LGERA 383; Michael Realty Pty Ltd v Carr [1975] 2 NSWLR 812; Pancho Properties Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council (1999) 110 LGERA 352; Pettey v Parsons [1914] 2 Ch 653; Powell v Langdon (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 136; Tulk v Moxhay (1948) 2 PH 774; 41 ER 1143; Wade v NSW Rutile Mining Co Pty Ltd (1969) 121 CLR 177; G H Wainwright v Canterbury Municipal Council [1992] NSWLEC 96 (30 October 1992); Zenere v Lete (1980) 1 BPR 930
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate