NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Halliday v Filmlock Pty Limited and Ors [2007] NSWLEC 477
APPLICANT Austin Michael Halliday
FIRST RESPONDENT Filmlock Pty Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Jakesam Developments Pty Limited
PARTIES : THIRD RESPONDENT Andcorp Pty Limited
FOURTH RESPONDENT JGT Investments Pty Limited
FIFTH RESPONDENT Gosford City Council
SIXTH RESPONDENT John Robar Boring Contractors Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40159 of 2006
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- civil enforcement - extra-curial settlement - no hearing on merits - each party ordered to pay its own costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 15 r 7 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69
Belmore Residents' Action Group Inc v Canterbury City Council (2006) 147 LGERA 226; Centro Properties Pty Limited v Hurstville City Council and Ors [2006] NSWLEC 78; Cutcliffe & Anor v Lithgow City Council & Ors (2006) 147 LGERA 330; CASES CITED: Hayden Theatres v Penrith Council (1999) 105 LGERA 230; Kiama Council v Grant (2006) 143 LGERA 441; One.Tel Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 101 FCR 548; Re The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia and Anor; Ex Parte Lai Quin (1997) 186 CLR 622
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate