NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hastings Point Progress Association Inc v Tweed Shire Council and Anor; Hastings Point Progress Association Inc v Tweed Shire Council and Ors [2008] NSWLEC 180
APPLICANT Hastings Point Progress Association Inc FIRST RESPONDENT Tweed Shire Council SECOND RESPONDENTS PARTIES : Aeklig Pty Ltd Planit Consulting Pty Ltd THIRD RESPONDENTS Kylie Ann Campion Jody Anne Kearney Kelly Anne Gillies
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40785 of 2007, 40967 of 2007
CORAM: Pain J
Judicial Review :- application under State Environment Planning Policy (Seniors Living) 2004 (SEPPSL) - whether inconsistency between SEPPSL and mandatory precondition to grant of development consent in local environmental plan - whether decision to grant development consent manifestly unreasonable KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- application under Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2000 - whether Council failed to consider strategic review of heights of buildings - whether cumulative impact assessment required and undertaken - whether decision to grant development consent manifestly unreasonable
Associations Incorporation Act 1984 Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 s 64, s 79C Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 25B Manly Local Environmental Plan 1998 LEGISLATION CITED: Penrith Local Environmental Plan No 231 State Environmental Planning Policy No 5 – Housing for Older People or People with a Disability State Environmental Planning Policy No 71 – Coastal Protection State Environmental Planning Policy (Seniors Living) 2004 cl 4, cl 5, cl 17, cl 18, cl 30, cl 31, cl 78 Sutherland Local Environmental Plan 1993 Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2000 cl 4, cl 5, cl 8, cl 11, cl 16
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate