NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Donnellan v Ku-ring-gai Council [2008] NSWLEC 1462 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Steve Donnellan PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10955 of 2008
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Section 96 Application :- Modify the s 94 contributions imposed on a development consent for a residential flat building
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
CASES CITED: Meriton Apartments Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council (2006) NSW LEC 776
DATES OF HEARING: 19/11/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 19 November 2008
APPLICANT Ms R. Dawes, solicitor of Lindsay Taylor Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr P. Marincowitz, solicitor DLA Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
19 November 2008
10955 of 2008 Steve Donnellan v Ku-ring-gai Council This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
JUDGMENT 1 This appeal was lodged against council's refusal to s 96 application to modify the s 94 contributions imposed on a development consent for a 32 unit residential flat building development at 26-30 Marion Street, Killara.
2 The details of the various components of the s 94 contributions are contained in the Statement of Facts and Contentions and I rely to these. During the appeal there has been conferencing between the parties, resulting in an agreement to the revised s 94 contributions and consequently that has lead to the parties also agreeing to consent orders. 3 The sole issue in this matter was the quantum of the s 94 contributions based on council's s 94 contributions plan. However, in another matter, which was Meriton Apartments Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council (2006) NSW LEC 776, the s 94 contribution plan was challenged. His Honour Justice Talbot reviewed some of the components in that plan and the amount of contributions was reduced.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate