NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 163 LGERA 1
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Broker Pty Limited v Shoalhaven City Council [2007] NSWLEC 789
APPLICANT Broker Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Shoalhaven City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40045 of 2007
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Construction and Interpretation :- s 94 contributions for residential subdivison - whether parts of amended s 94 contributions plan beyond power: s 94EA Environmental Planning and Assessment Act - whether consent for residential subdivison implied consent to use of land for residential purposes - whether Wednesbury unreasonableness in Council's decision to adopt amended plan
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 76A, s 79C, s 81A, s85, s 85A, s 86, s 94, s 94EA, s 94EC, s 149 LEGISLATION CITED: Shoalhaven City Council Contributions Plan 1993 Shoalhaven City Council Section 94 Contributions Plan 1993 Amendment 77 (Area 5) Amendment No 2 Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 1985
Anderson v Minister for Infrastructure Planning and Natural Resources [2006] NSWLEC 725; Associated Provincial Picture houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223; CASES CITED: Lesnewski v Mosman Municipal Council [2004] NSWLEC 99; McIntyre v Pittwater Council [2000] NSWLEC 160; Murrumbidgee Groundwater Preservation Association Inc v Minister for Natural Resources (2005) 138 LGERA 11; Weal v Bathurst City Council (2000) 111 LGERA 181
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate