NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Adamski v Betty (No 3) [2007] NSWLEC 717
APPLICANT Caesar Adamski PARTIES : RESPONDENT Dorothy Betty
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20087 of 2007
CORAM: Moore C - Fakes AC
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure - Trees (Neighbours) - Neighbour Application :- Correction of orders
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Adamski v Betty (No 2) 2007 NSWLEC 330
DATES OF HEARING: 19 October 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 19 October 2007
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms Betty (daughter)
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C FAKES AC
19 October 2007
20087 of 2007 Caesar Adamski v Dorothy Betty
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 COMMISSIONERS: This is a matter we are dealing with pursuant to Pt 15 r 9 of the Land and Environment Court Rules 1996, following the inadvertent omission from the orders of the Court made and filed on 24 April 2007 of a requirement reflecting para 40 of our judgment in Adamski v Betty (No 2) 2007 NSWLEC 330. The omitted order would have required, following the inspection of the Bunya Pine provided for in order 19 of the Orders of 24 April, the automatic removal following the inspection, pursuant to that order, of any cones of greater than 100 mm in any dimension .
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate