NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Inbari &anor v Rankin [2010] NSWLEC 1236
APPLICANTS S & R Inbari PARTIES : RESPONDENT K Rankin
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20398 of 2010
CORAM: Moore SC - Galwey AC
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :-
Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Dividing Fences Act 1991
CASES CITED: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292
DATES OF HEARING: 20 August 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25 August 2010
APPLICANTS Mr J Johnson, barrister LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS Mr P Ludemann, solicitor Ballidu Legal
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC GALWEY AC
25 August 2010
10/20398 Inbari & anor v Rankin
JUDGMENT 1 THE COMMISSIONERS: This is an application made pursuant to Part 2 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act). The application seeks an order for the removal of a Liquidambar tree (Liquidambar styraciflua) (the tree) located on the boundary between the two properties in the Sydney suburb of Cremorne. The application also seeks an order for the reinstatement, after the tree is removed, of the dividing fence between the two properties. Although not expressly so put, the application would appear to also contemplate an order pursuant to s 13A of the Dividing Fences Act 1991 for the reinstatement of length of the fence that is not impacted by the tree – this approach confirmed and an offer was made by Mr. Johnson, barrister for Mr and Mrs Inbari, that Mr and Mrs Inbari were prepared to meet half the cost of reinstatement of that portion of the fence that was not affected by the tree.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate