NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Bales Investments Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 1187
APPLICANT Bales Investments Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Cessnock City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11080 of 2008
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES: :- NOTICE OF MOTION; amendment of condition of consent
LEGISLATION CITED: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Bales Investment Proprietary Limited and others v Cessnock City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1102 Dayho v Rockdale City Council [2004] NSWLEC 184 CASES CITED: Newmont Yandall Operations Proprietary Limited v Aron Corporation Goldman Sachs Group Incorporated [2007] 17 NSWLR 411 Autodesk Incorporated and others v Dyason and others [No 2] 1992-1993 176CLR Wentworth v Rogers [No 9] 1987 8 NSWLR 388
DATES OF HEARING: 1 May 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 1 May 2009
APPLICANT C R Ireland (barrister) SOLICITOR O'Sullivan Saddington LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT T G Howard (barrister) SOLICITOR Mallick Rees
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Bly C
1 MAY 2009
08/11080 BALES INVESTMENTS PTY LTD AND ANOR v CESSNOCK CITY COUNCIL This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate