NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Alphatex Australia v The Hills Shire Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 1126
APPLICANT Alphatex Australia PARTIES : RESPONDENT The Hills Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11120 of 2008
CORAM: Moore SC
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN :- KEY ISSUES: Brothel Proper role of Planning Principles
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Alphatex Australia v The Hills Shire Council [2009] NSWLEC 1104 Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167; (2001) 115 LGERA 373 Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614 Parsonage v Ku-ring-gai [2004] NSWLEC 347 (2004); 139 LGERA 354 CASES CITED: Tenacity Consulting v Warringah [2004] NSWLEC 140; (2004) 134 LGERA 23 Segal & Anor v Waverley Council [2005] NSWCA 310 (2005) 64 NSWLR 177 Randall Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council [2004] NSWLEC 277 Vinson v Randwick Council [2005] NSWLEC 142; (2005) 141 LGERA 27 Kentucky Fried Chicken v Gantidis [1979] HCA 20; (1979) 140 CLR 675
DATES OF HEARING: 11 and 12 March 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29 April 2009
APPLICANT Mr A Galasso SC INSTRUCTED BY Hannaford Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Leggat SC INSTRUCTED BY Maddocks Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate