NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tou and anor v Maskiney [2010] NSWLEC 1068
APPLICANTS Iat Sang Tou PARTIES : Hilda Hing Hing
RESPONDENT Charles Maskiney
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20919 of 2009
CORAM: Fakes C
TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- Damage to property KEY ISSUES: Compensation Injury to persons
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 22/03/10
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22 March 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 22 March 2010
APPLICANT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Ms Helen Sin (solicitor) RESPONDENT Ms Susan Barry-Cotter (solicitor)
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes C
22 March 2010
20919 of 2009 Tou v Maskiney
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act) made by Mr and Mrs Tou of 28 Starkey Street Forestville against the owner of a tree growing at 30 Starkey Street. The owner of that property is Mr Maskiney. The applicants were represented by Ms H Sin, solicitor and the respondent by Ms S Barry-Cotter, solicitor.
2 The applicants are seeking the removal of the tree, a mature Casuarina cunninghamiana (River She-Oak), at the owner's expense, as they contend that the tree has caused damage to their property and could be a risk of injury to persons. They are also seeking compensation for a number of items.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate