NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hurstville City Council v Jacobs [2007] NSWLEC 630
APPLICANT Hurstville City Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT Kevin Roy Jacobs
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40013 of 2006
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Civil Enforcement :- motion to set aside consent orders - practice and procedure - whether perfected orders could be set aside - motion dismissed
LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993
Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529 ; Cachia v Colaco (2003) 132 LGERA 62; DJL v The Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 ; Logwon Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council (1993) 33 NSWLR 13; Memel Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2000] NSWLEC 227; Mohinder Singh v Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services [2001] FCA 1281; CASES CITED: National Parks and Wildlife Service & Anor v Stables Perisher Pty Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 573 ; Paino v Hofbauer (1988) 13 NSWLR 193; Permewan Wright Consolidated Pty Ltd v Attorney-General (1978) 35 NSWLR 365 ; Starray Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (2001) 112 LGERA 438; Wollong Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council (No 2) (2002) 122 LGERA 178 ; Woollahra Municipal Council v Ferella (2005) 141 LGERA 166; Young v Jackman [1986] 7 NSWLR 97
DATES OF HEARING: 18/9/2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate