NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Robinson v Lithgow City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1185
APPLICANT David Robinson PARTIES : RESPONDENT Lithgow City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10033 of 2010
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- Amusement centre, Suitability of site - isolation, lack of lighting, potential for increased crime, Public interest - adverse impact on the safety and amenity of adjoining properties.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Lithgow City Local Environmental Plan 1994 Greater Lithgow City Council - Off Street Parking Development Control Greater Lithgow City Council - Outdoor Advertising Development Control Plan
CASES CITED: Zhang and Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167
DATES OF HEARING: 30 April 2010, further advice 7 May 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30 July 2010
APPLICANT Mr M Fragar (Agent)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S Griffiths (solicitor) SOLICITOR Pikes Lawyers
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
30 July 2010
10033 of 2010 David Robinson v Lithgow City Council
JUDGMENT 1 The applicant is seeking consent for an amusement centre in premises known as No. 1 Naomi Street Lithgow. The proposal is for 18 amusement machines to be installed in the premises. It is proposed that a CCTV security system and security lighting be installed. 2 The site is within the town centre of Lithgow and has both vehicle and pedestrian access from known Naomi Street, a side street off the Main Street within the central business district. At the rear of the site there is a large council car park that serves a supermarket (60 metres away) and other business premises, and the Police , about 50 metres across the Council carpark at the rear of the site Figure 1 provides photographs of the subject premises and Figure 2 is an aerial photograph that shows the location of the subject. 3 The land is Lot 1 DP 604850 and it has an area of some 830m2 with a frontage of about 30metres on the eastern side of Naomi Street. 4 The existing single storey brick building on the site contains a pet shop and was previously used as an office furniture showroom, and prior to this a garden centre. 5 The site is fully enclosed by walls and fencing and there is no change proposed to the external form of the building. 6 The amusement centre is proposed to have the following hours of operation: Winter: April-September School Term Monday to Friday: 11 am to 6.30pm Saturday: 9am to 7.30pm School Holidays: Monday to Friday: 9am to 6.30pm Saturday: 9am to 7.30pm Summer October – March School Term Monday to Friday: 11 am to 8pm Saturday: 9am to 8pm School Holidays Monday to Friday: 9am to 8pm Saturday: 9am to 8pm Sunday/Public Holidays: Closed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate