NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hough & anor v Rettenmaier & anor [2010] NSWLEC 1354
APPLICANTS N & D Hough PARTIES : RESPONDENTS P Rettenmaier & K Greig
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20639 of 2010
CORAM: Moore SC - Hewett AC
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- Impact on views; hedge of bamboo
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Regulation 2007
DATES OF HEARING: 13 October 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 13 October 2010
APPLICANTS In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC HEWETT AC
13 October 2010
10/20639 Hough & anor v Rettenmaier & anor
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: These proceedings are the first proceedings heard and determined by the Court pursuant to Part 2A of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act). Part 2A came into effect from 2 August 2010 and permits the Court to deal with applications concerning high hedges that obscure sunlight or views.
2 There are a variety of jurisdictional prerequisites that the Court must consider and about which the Court must be satisfied prior to its jurisdiction being enlivened under Part 2A. We propose to step through each of those jurisdictional prerequisites and indicate how we are satisfied that they are met, in these proceedings, to the extent that they are so met. 3 The first provision that is relevant is that which arises under s 14A(1) of the Trees Act. It requires that four elements be satisfied. The first is that the plants that are involved are trees. In these proceedings, the plants that are involved forming the hedge that is the subject of the application are bamboo, which is a plant that in botanical terms is a grass. However, as a consequence of cl 4 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Regulation 2007 bamboo is proscribed as being a tree for the purposes of the definition of "tree" in s 3(1) of the Trees Act. As a consequence we are satisfied that that element of s 3 is as satisfied.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate