NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Homemaker Hub Pty Limited v Strathfield Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 79
APPLICANT PARTIES : Homemaker Hub Pty Limited RESPONDENT Strathfield Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11199 of 2008
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- whether respondent should be released from confidentiality undertaking in relation to commercial in confidence material
Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Maurice and Ors (1986) 161 CLR 475 Casey v 90 East (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd [2001] ACTSC 123 CASES CITED: Church of Scientology of California v Dept of Health and Social Security [1979] 3 All ER 97 Milne v Minister for Planning [2006] NSWLEC 745 Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 Terry Street Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (2006) 145 LGERA 137
TEXTS CITED: Lexis Nexis, Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW (Volume 1, 2005)
DATES OF HEARING: 19 May 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20 May 2009
APPLICANT Mr C McEwen SC with Mr M Staunton SOLICITORS Gilbert and Tobin LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr T Hale SC SOLICITORS Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Pain J
20 May 2009
11199 of 2008 Homemaker Hub Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council (No 2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate